Minnesota Supreme Court, 1926

State v. Graves

State v. Graves
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided February 20, 1926 · PER CURIAM.
207 N.W. 560; 166 Minn. 496; 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1231 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

Russell C. Rosenquest , for appellant. Gilbert E. Harris , Special Attorney, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1952, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

State v. Graves

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment adjudging appellant guilty of the offense of practicing dentistry without a license.

The appellant makes the claim that G. S. 1923, § 5760, is unconstitutional because it excludes from practice those who do not hold a diploma from a dental college in good standing notwithstanding their actual qualification and ability to serve as dentists.

Upon authority of State v. Graves, 161 Minn. 422, 201 N. W. 933, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.