Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
Minnesota Supreme Court
Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 214 N.W. 795 (Minn. 1927)
171 Minn. 519; 1927 Minn. LEXIS 1642
PER CURIAM.
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
Opinion of the Court
Motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari herein because not served upon the adverse party within 60 days as provided by G. S. 1923, §§ 9769 and 9770. The proceedings are under the compensation act, which does not specifically provide for service on the adverse party though it provides for service on the industrial commission. G. S. 1923, § 4320. Section 9770 is applicable. Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339, 208 N. W. 18. Such service may be made upon counsel who has appeared for the adverse party. G. S. 1923, § 9240.
The motion is granted and the writ is quashed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Frank Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Company. [Fn1]
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published