Perkovich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1945, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Haimila v. the Opsahl Co. (Minn. 1940)
- Larson v. Le Mere (Minn. 1945)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Motion to dismiss the writ of certiorari herein because not served upon the adverse party within 60 days as provided by G. S. 1923, §§ 9769 and 9770. The proceedings are under the compensation act, which does not specifically provide for service on the adverse party though it provides for service on the industrial commission. G. S. 1923, § 4320. Section 9770 is applicable. Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn. 339, 208 N. W. 18. Such service may be made upon counsel who has appeared for the adverse party. G. S. 1923, § 9240.
The motion is granted and the writ is quashed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.