Dotlich v. Shenango Furnace Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1933, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company (Minn. 1933)
- Rosenquist v. O'Neil & Preston (Minn. 1932)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission refusing relator’s application for a rehearing of his petition for compensation.
On December 29, 1925, relator was in the employ of respondent as a . miner at a weekly wage of $37.50. During the forenoon of that day, while engaged with a fellow servant in placing a timber, in the usual course of his employment, the relator claims to have received an injury to his back. In April, 1926, relator filed a petition with the commission for compensation. Issue was joined and the matter heard before a referee, and findings denying compensation were filed on September 7, 1926. An appeal was taken to the commission, where the order and findings of the referee were affirmed. Subsequently the relator made application to the commission for an order for a new hearing upon the petition, which application was denied. The application was submitted to the commission upon all the records and files in the proceeding and upon several affidavits.
*604 A reading of the record and affidavits makes it clear that the granting of a rehearing rested in the discretion of the commission, with which this court cannot interfere. Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co. supra, p. 489.
Writ discharged.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.