Peterson v. City of Minneapolis

Minnesota Supreme Court
Peterson v. City of Minneapolis, 216 N.W. 228 (Minn. 1927)
172 Minn. 604; 1927 Minn. LEXIS 1342
PER CURIAM.

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Peterson v. City of Minneapolis

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant city from completing condemnation proceedings instituted pursuant to L. 1925, p. 676, c. 417, to acquire certain lands belonging to the plaintiff for the purpose of widening a city street.

The statute gives a right of appeal to the district court from the order of confirmation of the city council. We are unable to see that the plaintiff may not get appropriate relief upon appeal. If so an injunction should not he granted. Plaintiff’s brief states that an appeal has been taken.

Order affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Eugene G. Peterson v. City of Minneapolis and Another. [Fn1]
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published