Peterson v. City of Minneapolis
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1929, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Freding v. City of Minneapolis (Minn. 1929)
- Peterson v. City of Minneapolis (Minn. 1928)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant city from completing condemnation proceedings instituted pursuant to L. 1925, p. 676, c. 417, to acquire certain lands belonging to the plaintiff for the purpose of widening a city street.
The statute gives a right of appeal to the district court from the order of confirmation of the city council. We are unable to see that the plaintiff may not get appropriate relief upon appeal. If so an injunction should not he granted. Plaintiff’s brief states that an appeal has been taken.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.