Medgorden v. Paulson
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1927, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- First State Bank v. Pearson (Minn. 1927)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The garnishees appeal from an order made pursuant to G. S. 1923, § 9367, granting the plaintiff leave to file a supplemental complaint making them parties.
*369 In Prince v. Heenan, 5 Minn. 279 (347), it is held that sucli order is not appealable. It does not go to the merits nor prevent the entry of a judgment determining the rights of the garnishees. If the order had denied the plaintiff leave to ñle a supplemental complaint, the result might be different, for then the plaintiff could not have had his claim adjudicated. See Wipperman Merc. Co. v. Jacobson, 133 Minn. 326, 158 N. W. 606. The order is reviewable but not appealable.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.