State v. Anderson

Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Anderson, 217 N.W. 351 (Minn. 1927)
173 Minn. 293
PER CURIAM.

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 14 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State v. Anderson

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment.- Defendant was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. On cross-examination he was required to testify over proper objection that he had first plead guilty to the accusation made in the information upon which he was on trial and that he thereafter withdrew such plea by leave of the court. This was error. Under such circumstances the former plea is held for naught. Kercheval v. U. S. 274 U. S. 220, 47 S. Ct. 582, 71 L. ed. 1009. A new trial is granted.

Reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name
State v. H.M. Anderson. [Fn1]
Cited By
17 cases
Status
Published