Minnesota Supreme Court, 1927

State v. Anderson

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided December 31, 1927 · PER CURIAM.

217 N.W. 351; 173 Minn. 293 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

A.R. English and Hall Gislason , for appellant. Clifford L. Hilton , Attorney General, James E. Markham , Deputy Attorney General, and William R. Mitchell , County Attorney, for the state.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1982, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

15 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Weekly (Wash. 1952)
State v. Jackson (Minn. 1982)
State v. Sha (Minn. 1972)
State v. Hayes (Minn. 1969)
State v. Wright (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967)
State v. Reardon (Minn. 1955)
State v. Thomson (Or. 1954)
State v. McClain (Minn. 1940)
State v. McGunn (Minn. 1940)
Frantz v. State (Okla. Crim. App. 1940)
People v. Street (Mich. 1939)
State v. Cater (Minn. 1934)
State v. Hook (Minn. 1928)
People v. George (Mich. Ct. App. 1976)
People v. Spitaleri (N.Y. 1961)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment.- Defendant was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. On cross-examination he was required to testify over proper objection that he had first plead guilty to the accusation made in the information upon which he was on trial and that he thereafter withdrew such plea by leave of the court. This was error. Under such circumstances the former plea is held for naught. Kercheval v. U. S. 274 U. S. 220, 47 S. Ct. 582, 71 L. ed. 1009. A new trial is granted.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.