Worth Savings Bank v. Foster

Minnesota Supreme Court
Worth Savings Bank v. Foster, 221 N.W. 12 (Minn. 1928)
175 Minn. 293; 1928 Minn. LEXIS 874
PER CURIAM.

Worth Savings Bank v. Foster

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

*294 All questions raised by this appeal are disposed of by the opinion in the case of Olsen v. Hoffmann, 175 Minn. 287, 221 N. W. 10. The fact that the notes were indorsed by the payee “without recourse,” does not indicate bad faith. Collins v. McDowell, 65 Minn. 110, 67 N. W. 845; Park v. Hudson, 154 Minn. 471, 479, 192 N. W. 112.

Order affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Worth Savings Bank v. George Foster. [Fn1]
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published