Worth Savings Bank v. Foster
Worth Savings Bank v. Foster
221 N.W. 12; 175 Minn. 293; 1928 Minn. LEXIS 874
(North Western Reporter)
Worth Savings Bank v. Foster
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
*294 All questions raised by this appeal are disposed of by the opinion in the case of Olsen v. Hoffmann, 175 Minn. 287, 221 N. W. 10. The fact that the notes were indorsed by the payee “without recourse,” does not indicate bad faith. Collins v. McDowell, 65 Minn. 110, 67 N. W. 845; Park v. Hudson, 154 Minn. 471, 479, 192 N. W. 112.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.