Minnesota Supreme Court, 1928

Worth Savings Bank v. Foster

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided August 3, 1928 · PER CURIAM.

221 N.W. 12; 175 Minn. 293; 1928 Minn. LEXIS 874 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

Albert Hauser , for appellant. Mueller Erickson , for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Eastern Acceptance Corp. v. Kavlick (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1950)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

*294 All questions raised by this appeal are disposed of by the opinion in the case of Olsen v. Hoffmann, 175 Minn. 287, 221 N. W. 10. The fact that the notes were indorsed by the payee “without recourse,” does not indicate bad faith. Collins v. McDowell, 65 Minn. 110, 67 N. W. 845; Park v. Hudson, 154 Minn. 471, 479, 192 N. W. 112.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.