Kuske v. Jevne

Minnesota Supreme Court
Kuske v. Jevne, 218 N.W. 93 (Minn. 1928)
173 Minn. 584; 1928 Minn. LEXIS 1064
PER CURIAM.

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Kuske v. Jevne

Opinion of the Court

*585 Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from an order vacating a writ of attachment and the levy- thereunder.

On the showing made before the trial court there was dispute as to some of the facts, and the facts that were undisputed were such that different inferences and conclusions could reasonably be drawn therefrom. In that situation the rule announced in First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425, 116 N. W. 917, applies.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Fred J. Kuske v. Franz Jevne and Another. [Fn1]
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published