Minnesota Supreme Court, 1928

In re Estate of Taylor

In re Estate of Taylor
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided December 14, 1928 · PER CURIAM.
222 N.W. 528; 176 Minn. 634; 1928 Minn. LEXIS 998 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

G. A. Youngquist , Attorney General, and John F. Bonner , Assistant Attorney General, for the state. Cadwalader, Wickersham Taft and Davis, Severance Morgan , for respondents.

In re Estate of Taylor

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a final order which is the equivalent of a judgment entered on November 14, 1928, adjudging in substance that the state is entitled to collect an inheritance tax in said estate in relation to municipal bonds issued by the cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and also in relation to certificates of indebtedness of the state of Minnesota.

The questions presented are those decided by this court on a former appeal as reported in 175 Minn. 310, 219 N. W. 153, 221 N. W. 64. Our previous conclusion was based upon the constitution of the United States and our conception of its construction by the United States Supreme Court. We did not there base our decision upon our own fundamental law but upon *635 the federal authority, and upon authority of our previous conclusion and the federal constitution the said final order or judgment from which this appeal is taken is affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.