Garbush v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1929, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This case was considered and determined on an appeal from an order denying a new trial. Garbush v. Order of U. C. T. of America, 173 Minn. 191, 217 N. W. 123. It was remanded; judgment was entered; and this appeal is from the judgment. It is submitted upon the record in the former appeal and again presents the questions there determined. That decision was final upon those questions.
The additional claim is now made that the former decision violates rights guaranteed to defendant by the federal and state constitutions. We are satisfied that it does not.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.