Minnesota Supreme Court, 1929

Dow-Arneson Co. v. City of St. Paul

Dow-Arneson Co. v. City of St. Paul
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided April 12, 1929 · PER CURIAM.
225 N.W. 92; 177 Minn. 164; 1929 Minn. LEXIS 998 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

Harris Richardson , for appellant. Eugene H. O'Neill , for respondent. C. J. Rockwood , amicus curiae, filed a brief in support of appellant's contention.

Dow-Arneson Co. v. City of St. Paul

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying a temporary injunction. The questions involved were considered in the Ryan case, 177 Minn. 146, 225 N. W. 86, where there was a trial on the facts. The decision in that case is necessarily controlling of this, and the court was right in denying a temporary injunction.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.