Minnesota Supreme Court, 1929

Garedpy v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Garedpy v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 18, 1929 · PER CURIAM.
226 N.W. 943; 178 Minn. 620; 1929 Minn. LEXIS 1256 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

F. W. Root, C. O. Newcomb and A. C. Erdall , for appellant. Tautges, Wilder McDonald , for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1959, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Garedpy v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appealed from a judgment entered on February 19, 1929, in the district court in the county of Dakota, the verdict of $33,000 having *621 been reduced to $23,000. The case was here before and is reported in 176 Minn. 331, 223 N. W. 605. The questions involved on this appeal are the same as those involved upon the former appeal, and for the reasons given in the previous opinion and upon authority of that opinion the judgment from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.