Moquin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1941, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Roadman v. C. E. Johnson Motor Sales (Minn. 1941)
- Guild v. Miller (Minn. 1937)
- Anderson v. Hawthorn Fuel Co. (Minn. 1936)
- Donnelly v. Stepka (Minn. 1934)
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Moquin (Supreme Court of the United States 1931)
- Hunter v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. (Minn. 1930)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The appeal is from a judgment. The case was here before and our opinion filed June 27, 1930. 181 Minn. 56, 231 N. W. 829. The questions involved upon this appeal are the same as those involved in the former appeal, and for the reasons given in the previous opinion and upon authority of that opinion the judgment from which this appeal was taken is affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.