Schlitz Commercial Co. v. Good Will League, Inc.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1959, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Rust (Minn. 1959)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Defendant is a Minnesota corporation and appeals from an order appointing a receiver for it. Plaintiff is a judgment creditor upon whose judgment an execution has been returned unsatisfied. The only claims here are that notice of the motion for the appointment of a receiver was given January 16, 1930, for a hearing on January 22, and that “proper service was not obtained upon the defendant company.” The trouble is that defendant appeared generally in opposition to the motion without suggesting that there was. any defect in the service of the notice or that timely service was not made. Having so appeared without objection, defendant could not thereafter aver want of jurisdiction.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.