Thompson v. Croff

Minnesota Supreme Court
Thompson v. Croff, 234 N.W. 688 (Minn. 1931)
182 Minn. 433; 1931 Minn. LEXIS 1190
Wilson

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Thompson v. Croff

Opinion of the Court

Wilson, O. J.

Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The action is for the specific performance of an alleged contract for deed. Plaintiff attacks a finding of the trial court to the effect that the alleged contract was incomplete and therefore unenforceable. This and numerous other assignments of error are not here considered since they avail plaintiff nothing because of either of two other findings of the trial court which are sustained by the evidence. One of these findings is that the plaintiff procured the contract by fraud; the other is that plaintiff is insolvent and is'financially unable to perform the contract on his own part.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Thor Thompson v. George Croff. [Fn1]
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published