Wallin v. Gust Lagerquist & Sons

Minnesota Supreme Court
Wallin v. Gust Lagerquist & Sons, 251 N.W. 669 (Minn. 1933)
190 Minn. 335; 1933 Minn. LEXIS 925
<italic>PER CURIAM</italic>.

Wallin v. Gust Lagerquist & Sons

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari to the industrial commission to review an order denying compensation.

The industrial commission concluded that relator had long since completed recovery from whatever disability he suffered by reason of an industrial accident August 29, 1929. He Avas totally disabled until sometime in December, 1929. He then took up light work, which he continued until April 5, 1930. Then he resumed his former occupation and April lá, 1930, executed final receipt for his compensation. In March, 1932, he was “let out” by his employers, not because of disability or claim thereof, but because they did not have the work to permit them to continue his employment. There is credible medical testimony supporting the conclusion that relator is uoav suffering no disability attributable to his accident. Having such support in the evidence, nothing more need be said to show that the decision of the industrial commission should not be disturbed.

The Avrit is discharged and the order of the commission affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Albert Wallin v. Gust Lagerquist Sons and Another. [Fn1]
Status
Published