Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n

Minnesota Supreme Court
Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n, 249 N.W. 893 (Minn. 1933)
189 Minn. 448; 1933 Minn. LEXIS 807
<italic>PER CURIAM</italic>.

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 4 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered upon the finding of fact and conclusions of law. The case was here on an appeal by the plaintiffs, or petitioners, from the order denying a new trial, wherein the decision was filed on July 7, 1933. 189 Minn. 422, 249 N. W. 334. This appeal attacks L. 1933, p. 514, c. 339, as violation of the same provisions of the constitution of the United States and of the constitution of this state as in the previous appeal, the parties having submitted the case on the same briefs.

We are of the opinion that the decision in the first appeal rules this appeal, and on the authority thereof the judgment is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
John H. Blaisdell and Another v. Home Building Loan Association. [Fn1]
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published