Blaisdell v. Home Building & Loan Ass'n
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1987, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell (Supreme Court of the United States 1934)
- ACA International v. Maura Healey (District Court, D. Massachusetts 2020)
- Carnel v. Travelers Insurance Co. (Minn. Ct. App. 1987)
- In re Kazas (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
- J. C. Penney Co. v. Diefendorf (Idaho 1934)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered upon the finding of fact and conclusions of law. The case was here on an appeal by the plaintiffs, or petitioners, from the order denying a new trial, wherein the decision was filed on July 7, 1933. 189 Minn. 422, 249 N. W. 334. This appeal attacks L. 1933, p. 514, c. 339, as violation of the same provisions of the constitution of the United States and of the constitution of this state as in the previous appeal, the parties having submitted the case on the same briefs.
We are of the opinion that the decision in the first appeal rules this appeal, and on the authority thereof the judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.