Minnesota Supreme Court, 1933

Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company

Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided January 6, 1933 · PER CURIAM.
246 N.W. 249; 187 Minn. 586; 1933 Minn. LEXIS 855 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

Streissguth Fordyce , for relator. Briggs, Weyl Briggs , for respondents.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1933, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*587 Per Curiam.

For an injury the relator was awarded compensation by a referee for a period of 47 4/7 weeks. No appeal was taken to the industrial commission, and after the time for appeal had expired the relator moved to vacate the award and for a rehearing. The petition to vacate was supported and opposed by affidavits from a number of physicians, and the question presented to the commission was clearly one of fact.

We discover no abuse of discretion on the part of the commission in denying the relief sought. Ogrosky v. Commonwealth Elec. Co. 172 Minn. 46, 214 N. W. 765; Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co. 172 Minn. 489, 216 N. W. 241; Dotlich v. Shenango Furnace Co. 172 Minn. 603, 216 N. W. 242.

Writ discharged and order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.