Minnesota Supreme Court, 1933

Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company

Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided January 6, 1933 · PER CURIAM.
246 N.W. 249; 187 Minn. 586; 1933 Minn. LEXIS 855 (North Western Reporter)

Baumann v. A. C. Ochs Brick Tile Company

Opinion of the Court

*587 Per Curiam.

For an injury the relator was awarded compensation by a referee for a period of 47 4/7 weeks. No appeal was taken to the industrial commission, and after the time for appeal had expired the relator moved to vacate the award and for a rehearing. The petition to vacate was supported and opposed by affidavits from a number of physicians, and the question presented to the commission was clearly one of fact.

We discover no abuse of discretion on the part of the commission in denying the relief sought. Ogrosky v. Commonwealth Elec. Co. 172 Minn. 46, 214 N. W. 765; Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co. 172 Minn. 489, 216 N. W. 241; Dotlich v. Shenango Furnace Co. 172 Minn. 603, 216 N. W. 242.

Writ discharged and order affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.