Minnesota Supreme Court, 1933

Natalino v. St. Paul Bridge & Terminal Railway Co.

Natalino v. St. Paul Bridge & Terminal Railway Co.
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided December 21, 1933 · <italic>PER CURIAM</italic>.
251 N.W. 669; 190 Minn. 124; 1933 Minn. LEXIS 889 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

D.L. Grannis and Barrows, Stewart, Jackson Junkin , for appellant. Samuel A. Anderson and Keefe Fallon , for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1959, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Natalino v. St. Paul Bridge & Terminal Railway Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a judgment.

The case was here before and our opinion filed November 10, 1933, 190 Minn. 118, 251 N. W. 9. For the reasons given in the previous opinion and upon authority of that opinion, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.