State v. Ginsberg
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1934, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Disbarment of Abe S. Ginsberg (Minn. 1934)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is a companion ease to State v. Smith, 192 Minn. 237, 255 N. W. 826. The defendant here is the Ginsberg referred to in that opinion. The evidence in this case is substantially the same as in the Smith case except that Ginsberg did not testify and that he took a more active part in the offense than did Smith. The same questions are raised by this appeal that were raised by Smith. The same result must follow. The judgment appéaled from is affirmed, and the sentence imposed by the trial court is directed to be executed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.