Klimes v. Hanek
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1946, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Nostdal v. County of Watonwan (Minn. 1946)
- Driessen v. Moening (Minn. 1940)
- Township of Normania v. County of Yellow Medicine (Minn. 1939)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Action to recover the value of three promissory notes alleged to have been converted by defendant and appropriated to his own use. Plaintiff had a verdict for the full amount claimed by him. The appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The issues were clearly ones of fact and for the jury. In a charge, the correctness of which is not questioned, the court properly submitted them. Plaintiff’s testimony and that of defendant were in many particulars in direct opposition. Plaintiff’s testimony had corroboration in all essential features. A recital of the facts is not necessary; neither the litigants nor the profession would benefit therefrom. No reversible errors occurred at the trial.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.