Monson v. Monson
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1964, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gerard v. Gerard (Minn. 1944)
- Raidt v. United States (Minn. 1964)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Action for divorce wherein defendant, the husband, prevailed on his cross bill. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
The record has been examined in the light of oral and written argument without disclosure of anything to suggest merit in the appeal, to say nothing of ground upon which to reverse or modify the decision. It is in the interest of the plaintiff that we refrain from much discussion of the facts.
Plaintiff’s case ivas dismissed at the close of her evidence. The order of dismissal was well justified on the evidence of plaintiff alone. The findings, on the evidence in support of defendant’s cross bill, that plaintiff was guilty of misconduct in at least two respects, one of them being cruel and inhuman treatment, are sustained. By the decree 'she was allowed a lump sum of $1,000 for alimony and all other claims against defendant or his property. At that time she seems to have agreed through her counsel that such allowance was fair. Anyway, she promptly took the money. Nothing appears which would justify us in giving her any more, even on account of attorney’s fees, on this appeal, which, we repeat, is found entirely without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.