Minnesota Supreme Court, 1935

Ahlquist v. Village of Mora

Ahlquist v. Village of Mora
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided March 22, 1935 · Stone
259 N.W. 692; 194 Minn. 112; 1935 Minn. LEXIS 943 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

Junell, Driscoll, Fletcher, Dorsey Barker, Kenneth M. Owen, Donald West, Olin Butler , and Halgren Gillespie , for appellant. Kyle Kyle and P.S. Olsen , for respondent. Harry H. Peterson , Attorney General, David J. Erickson , Assistant Attorney General, and Joseph M. Donahue and Dwight N. Johnson, amici curiae , filed a brief in support of the contention of respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1935, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Ahlquist v. Village of Mora

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decisions in the cases of Morgan v. Village of Mountain Lake, 194 Minn. 104, 259 N. W. 689, and Interstate Power Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. 194 Minn. 110, 259 N. W. 691, opinions in which are filed herewith, are controlling of the issues raised by this appeal with respect of claimed violations of provisions of the corrupt practices act.

As to alleged violations of the general election laws, the court’s findings—that the election was duly, legally, and properly called and held and duly and legally conducted and that the result of said election was a free, full, and fair expression of the will of the voters *113 without fraud, duress, or undue influence—are sufficiently supported by the evidence.

Affirmed.

Stone, Justice, took no part.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.