Minnesota Supreme Court, 1935

State Ex Rel. City of New Prague v. County of Le Sueur

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided July 5, 1935 · PER CURIAM.

261 N.W. 866; 195 Minn. 119; 1935 Minn. LEXIS 813 (North Western Reporter)

Counsel

Clarence O. Fehling , City Attorney, and Arthur J. Phil Jelinek , for appellants (relators below). George T. Havel , County Attorney, and Gallagher, Madden Gallagher , for respondents.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1951, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Hassler v. Engberg (Minn. 1951)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This case was argued and submitted with the companion case of the same parties appellants against Scott county and its auditor and treasurer. The decision in the Scott county case, State ex rel. City of New Prague v. County of Scott, 195 Minn. 111, 261 N. W. 863, filed herewith, controls this case and is here followed and applied.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.