Minnesota Supreme Court, 1939

Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided January 27, 1939 · PER CURIAM.
283 N.W. 750; 204 Minn. 348; 1939 Minn. LEXIS 569 (North Western Reporter)

Burns v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Opinion of the Court

*349 Pee Curiam.

This action to recover for default of an administrator against his surety was commenced November 20, 1937. Final decree determining and directing distribution of the estate was entered November 14, 1929. Judgment was ordered below on the pleadings because the statute of limitations had run. The attempted appeal is from the order for judgment. (Judgment has not been entered.) That order is not appealable, and hence the appeal must be dismissed. State ex rel. Quale v. Penney, 144 Minn. 463, 174 N. W. 611.

Inasmuch as we have heard the argument, it may not be amiss to say that the decision below appears correct under the rule of Ganser v. Ganser, 83 Minn. 199, 86 N. W. 18, 85 A. S. R. 461.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.