State v. Mitchell
State v. Mitchell
290 N.W. 222; 207 Minn. 55
(North Western Reporter)
State v. Mitchell
Opinion of the Court
Defendant was charged with disorderly conduct consisting of indecent exposure. He was found guilty. A recital of the facts would not be a benefit to the defendant or the bench and bar. It is sufficient to state that the question was essentially one of *56 identity of defendant as the guilty person. We have carefully read and considered the entire record and are satisfied that the lower court had a sufficient basis in the testimony to find that defendant was guilty. The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.