In Re Estate of Palm
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
In Re Estate of Palm
Opinion of the Court
October 7, 1919, appellant collected $2,021.52 under a policy insuring the life of Mr. Palm in which Mrs. Palm was the beneficiary. He admits that he is chargeable with that sum as of that date but now insists, and this is his whole case, that he should be charged in the other estate, that of the husband, rather than in this one, that of the wife. The beneficiaries of the two are identical, the four children of the deceased Palms. It is utterly *Page 88 immaterial whether Eriksson is charged with the amount in the one or the other estate. Therefore, the question is moot, and he has no ground upon which to argue that it was error to make the charge in this estate.
Judgment affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In Re Estate of Amelia Palm. Leonard Eriksson v. Elsie M. Palm and Others. [Fn1]
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published