Dehning v. Marshall Produce Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1986, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Marque Plumbing, Inc. v. Barris (Minn. Ct. App. 1986)
- Marque Plumbing, Inc. v. Barris (Minn. Ct. App. 1986)
- In re Township of Glendale, Scott County (Minn. 1970)
- Village of Savage v. Minnesota Municipal Commission (Minn. 1970)
- H & S COMPANY v. Minnesota State Board of Pharmacy (Minn. 1960)
- Barnes v. MacKen (Minn. 1958)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Certiorari to review an order of the commissioner of agriculture, dairy and food revoking a wholesale produce dealer’s license issued to the “Marshall Produce Company and/or Ortonville Produce Company” June 17, 1942, pursuant to Minn. St. 1941, § 27.04 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 6240-18½c).
The writ issued out of this court February 23, 1943. The commissioner filed his return thereto March 10. The record and relators’ brief were filed April 27; respondents’ brief, May 17; relators’ reply brief, May 19; and the case was argued in this court May 26.
*340 The license here involved expired May 31, 1943. A decision of the case on its merits would not benefit either party to this proceeding. Decisions in this court should be limited to real controversies involving existing facts and rights asserted thereunder. Anderson v. Village of Louisberg, 121 Minn. 528, 141 N. W. 97; State ex rel. Klemer v. City Recorder, 129 Minn. 535, 152 N. W. 654; Troy v. City of St. Paul, 155 Minn. 391, 193 N. W. 726; Moore v. McDonald, 165 Minn. 484, 205 N. W. 894; McDonald v. Brewery and Beverage D. & H. & W. Union, 215 Minn. 274, 9 N. W. (2d) 770. The question here involved is moot.
Writ discharged.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.