In re Disbarment of William Rudolph Lindquist
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1976, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Lindquist (Minn. 1976)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On October 5, 1943, respondent was convicted in the United States district court of Minnesota, fourth division, of the crime of having failed to report for induction into the armed forces of the United States after having been duly notified by his local draft board so to do.
On November 16, 1943, at 12:55 p. m., an order was served on respondent directing him to show cause before this court on November 26, 1943, at 10 o’clock a. m., why he should not be disbarred and his license to practice law revoked.
By affidavit of the secretary of the state board of law examiners, duly filed herein, it is made to appear that respondent is in default and has in no way appeared herein.
Therefore, It Is Ordered, that respondent, William Rudolph Lindquist, be disbarred as an attorney at law of this state and that his name be stricken from its roll of attorneys.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.