Lloyd v. Minnesota Valley Canning Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1952, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Frank v. Anderson Bros. (Minn. 1952)
- Sam's Place v. Middleton (Ala. Ct. App. 1958)
- Breimhorst v. Beckman (Minn. 1949)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This case comes here on appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the amended complaint. The action was by an employe against her employer, sounding in tort, for personal injuries resulting only in disfigurement not materially affecting plaintiff’s employ-ability. Plaintiff challenges the constitutionality of the workmen’s compensation act, but, since we hold that plaintiff’s injuries do not *306 fall within the coverage of that act, the question of constitutionality does not arise.
M. S. A. § 176.11, subd. 3(38), by necessary implication excludes from the coverage of the workmen’s compensation act disfigurement which does not materially affect employability. Therefore, plaintiff’s tort action for such disfigurement survived the enactment of the compensation act. Donnelly v. Minneapolis Mfg. Co. 161 Minn. 240, 201 N. W. 305; Rosenfield v. Matthews, 201 Minn. 113, 275 N. W. 698, and cases cited.
Order reversed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.