In re Van Wyck
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1947, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Application of Wyck (Minn. 1947)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Application for reinstatement as an attorney at law in this state. Objections to reinstatement were made by the State Board of Law Examiners and the Practice of Law Committee of the State Bar Association. On account of the heinous moral turpitude of the offense of which the applicant was convicted and for which he was disbarred, this court would not be justified in appointing a referee to take testimony in support of or in opposition to the application for reinstatement and would not be justified in reinstating the applicant to the bar of this state.
Application denied.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.