Minnesota Supreme Court, 1948

In Re Application Rerat

In Re Application Rerat
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided December 24, 1948 · PER CURIAM.
35 N.W.2d 291; 227 Minn. 248; 1948 Minn. LEXIS 664 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

In Re Application Rerat

Concurring Opinion

Peterson, Justice

(concurring in result).

I concur in the result.

Concurring Opinion

Thomas Gallagher, Justice

(concurring in result).

I concur in the result.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

This is an application by the petitioner to open the above proceeding to present additional evidence before the Honorable Rol E. Barron, the referee, whose report now before us is based upon evidence introduced at a hearing extending from March 8 to April 1, 1948. After careful consideration of the proposed evidence relative to charges presented to the referee, we conclude that such evidence would not change the findings of the referee, before whom the principal proposed witness’s deposition was read upon the hear *249 ing and who has already indicated that such witness is not entitled to credence. If as suggested by counsel the petitioner has evidence in support of additional charges, the obvious relief as to such charges is to file a petition covering them.

Application denied.

1

Reported in 35 N. W. (2d) 291.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.