Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Minnesota Supreme Court, 1948

Wilking v. County of Chippewa

Wilking v. County of Chippewa
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided February 6, 1948 · Julius, Magney, Olson
31 N.W.2d 437; 225 Minn. 425; 1948 Minn. LEXIS 541 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Sigvald B. Oyen and John P. Nelson , for appellant. R.M. Saltness and Ernest F. Jacobson , for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1949, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Wilking v. County of Chippewa

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 31 N.W.2d 437. The principal questions raised in this case were considered and determined in Oleson v. County of Chippewa, 225 Minn. 412,31 N.W.2d 432. However, an additional element enters into this case. Petitioner acquired the land being assessed on May 4, 1938. Much of the work had been done prior to that date. In State v. Weyerhauser, 68 Minn. 353, 372, 71 N.W. 265, 271, the court stated:

"* * * Property should not and cannot escape its just share of taxation by merely changing owners. It is not the individual which *Page 426 the government seeks, upon whom to impose the taxes, but the property itself, a proceeding, as it were, in rem."

In the same case it also stated (68 Minn. 371, 71 N.W. 271):

"In respect to the question that the lands have changed ownership since the assessment, and that defendants have purchased the property since the original assessment and payment of the taxes by the then owners, it must be conceded that an apparent hardship has been produced. Upon this point Blackwell on Tax Titles, § 951, says:

" 'Individual hardship may sometimes be produced, as where lands have changed hands since the time when the tax should have been collected from it; but similar injustice in particular cases is incident to all taxation, and will not avoid such a reassessment.' "

County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256, 17 N.W. 473, 944; State v. Foster, 104 Minn. 408,116 N.W. 826; Croswell v. Benton, 54 Minn. 264, 55 N.W. 1125; State v. O'Connell,170 Minn. 76, 211 N.W. 945.

Judgments reversed.

UPON APPLICATION FOR REARGUMENT.
On March 12, 1948, the following opinion was filed:

Addendum

Judgments modified in accordance with original opinion herein, following opinion on application for reargument in Oleson v. County of Chippewa, 225 Minn. 422, 31 N.W.2d 437, filed herewith.

MR. JUSTICE JULIUS J. OLSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. *Page 427

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.