Minnesota Supreme Court, 1950

State ex rel. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Weeks

State ex rel. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Weeks
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided February 10, 1950
230 Minn. 581; 41 N.W.2d 177; 1950 Minn. LEXIS 652 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Butchick, Smith & Enkel, for relators., Francis X. Helgesen, for respondent Minnesota State Industrial Union Council., Morgan, Chase, Headley & Hoshour, for respondent Western Electric Company, Inc.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1960, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

State ex rel. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Weeks

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This matter came before the court on February 7, 1950, for hearing on an alternative writ of prohibition relative to the enforcement of an order of the district court of Hennepin county in the above-entitled matter, dated January 12, 1950. Examination of the record discloses that that order by its terms remains β€œin effect only until 10:00 A. M. February 6, 1950, * * * at which time said order shall be of no further effect and shall become null and void.”

Consequently, the question presented by the alternative writ has become moot. The writ is discharged with costs to respondents.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.