Minnesota Supreme Court, 1955

Hallada v. Great Northern Railway

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided June 10, 1955

245 Minn. 581; 72 N.W.2d 74; 1955 Minn. LEXIS 683 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Edwin C. Matthias, Anthony Kane, W. P. Westphal, and R. J. Quinlivan, for appellant., Davis, Rerat, Yaeger & Lush and Harry H. Peterson, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1966, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Evening Star Newspaper Company v. Gray (D.C. 1962)
Vanderlinde v. Wehle (Minn. 1966)
State v. LaBarre (Minn. 1959)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment. The case was here before on an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. Our opinion filed February 25, 1955, *582affirmed the order appealed from if plaintiff within ten days after the filing of the remittitur in the lower court shall file his written consent to a reduced verdict in the sum of $105,000. Hallada v. G. N. Ry. 244 Minn. 81, 69 N. W. (2d) 673. Within the ten-day period plaintiff filed his written consent to a reduction of the verdict. For the reasons given in the previous opinion the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.