Hallada v. Great Northern Railway

Minnesota Supreme Court
Hallada v. Great Northern Railway, 245 Minn. 581 (Minn. 1955)
72 N.W.2d 74; 1955 Minn. LEXIS 683

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 4 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Hallada v. Great Northern Railway

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment. The case was here before on an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. Our opinion filed February 25, 1955, *582affirmed the order appealed from if plaintiff within ten days after the filing of the remittitur in the lower court shall file his written consent to a reduced verdict in the sum of $105,000. Hallada v. G. N. Ry. 244 Minn. 81, 69 N. W. (2d) 673. Within the ten-day period plaintiff filed his written consent to a reduction of the verdict. For the reasons given in the previous opinion the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
WILLIAM E. HALLADA, JR. v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published