State v. Alm

Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Alm, 246 Minn. 568 (Minn. 1956)
75 N.W.2d 212; 1956 Minn. LEXIS 543
Per Curiam

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 9 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State v. Alm

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff moves for a dismissal of the appeal of the defendant from the order of the District Court of Kandiyohi County denying defendant’s petition for a writ of coram nobis. The motion is made upon the ground that the notice of appeal was not served either upon the county attorney or the attorney general. Defendant concedes that such service was- not made. The appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 2

2

See, M. S. A. 632.02, 605.03; State v. Besse, 160 Minn. 533, 200 N. W. 356; State v. Newman, 188 Minn. 461, 247 N. W. 576. Whether the review should be some other remedy than appeal we need not determine.

Reference

Full Case Name
State v. Warren H. Alm
Cited By
9 cases
Status
Published