Erickson v. Bakke
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Erickson v. Bakke
Opinion of the Court
Associate Justice Thomas Gallagher deeming himself disqualified to participate in the consideration or decision of the questions presented by this appeal, and the other members of the court being equally divided, the order of the lower court is affirmed without opinion.
Affirmed.
Armstrong v. City of Rochester, 211 Minn. 613, 299 N. W. 683; 1 Dunnell, Dig. (3 ed.) § 290, and cases cited therein.
070rehearing
Upon Rehearing.
On December 19, 1958, the following opinion was filed:
Associate Justice Thomas Gallagher deeming himself disqualified to participate in the consideration or decision of the questions presented by this appeal, and the other members of the court after the rehearing still being equally divided, the order of the lower court is affirmed without opinion.
Affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Leslie Erickson v. A. R. Bakke and Another.
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- Appeal and error — decision by equally divided court.