Minnesota Supreme Court, 1958

Erickson v. Bakke

Erickson v. Bakke
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided April 3, 1958 · No. 37
253 Minn. 577; 95 N.W.2d 656; 1958 Minn. LEXIS 703 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Leonard, Street & Deinard, for appellants., Leslie Erickson, pro se, and Harry H. Peterson, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2024, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Erickson v. Bakke

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Associate Justice Thomas Gallagher deeming himself disqualified to participate in the consideration or decision of the questions presented by this appeal, and the other members of the court being equally divided, the order of the lower court is affirmed without opinion.1

Affirmed.

Armstrong v. City of Rochester, 211 Minn. 613, 299 N. W. 683; 1 Dunnell, Dig. (3 ed.) § 290, and cases cited therein.

070rehearing

Upon Rehearing.

On December 19, 1958, the following opinion was filed:

Per Curiam.

Associate Justice Thomas Gallagher deeming himself disqualified to participate in the consideration or decision of the questions presented by this appeal, and the other members of the court after the rehearing still being equally divided, the order of the lower court is affirmed without opinion.1

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.