Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller

Minnesota Supreme Court
Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller, 258 Minn. 585 (Minn. 1960)
105 N.W.2d 689; 1960 Minn. LEXIS 642
Loevinger

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 3 citing opinions

  • —
  • —

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Due to the absence of Associate Justice Leroy E. Matson because of illness on the date set for hearing of this appeal, the case was heard by six of the justices of this court, and they being equally divided as to the *586 issues presented on appeal, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed without opinion. 1

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Loevinger, not having been a member of the court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
1

Armstrong v. City of Rochester, 211 Minn. 613, 299 N. W. 683; 1 Dunnell, Dig. (3 ed.) § 290, and cases cited therein.

Reference

Full Case Name
Anchor Casualty Company v. Charles Miller and Others. Gerald Keep and Others, Appellants. Arthur O. Hartman and Another, Appellants
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published
↑