State Ex Rel. Cole v. Tahash

Minnesota Supreme Court
State Ex Rel. Cole v. Tahash, 263 Minn. 579 (Minn. 1962)
116 N.W.2d 266; 1962 Minn. LEXIS 815
Per Curiam

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State Ex Rel. Cole v. Tahash

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent, warden of the State Prison, moves for a dismissal of the appeal of relator from an order of the Washington County District Court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The motion is made on the ground that the form of the notice of appeal is insufficient in that it is not directed to the attorney general and simply states: “Petitioner, in the above intitle matter wishes to appeal his denial for writ of habeas corpus — to the Minn. Supreme Court in Forma Pauperis.” And the motion is made on the further ground that no notice of appeal was served upon the attorney general as required by statute. Relator filed no answer to the motion and we therefore assume that he concedes such service was not made.

While the form of the notice of appeal might be regarded as sufficient under statutes and our prior decisions, service of the notice of appeal is jurisdictional. We therefore have no authority to hear the appeal. 1

Appeal dismissed.

1

See, Minn. St. 589.29, 632.02; State ex rel. Farrington v. Rigg, 248 Minn. 49, 78 N. W. (2d) 721; State v. Alm, 246 Minn. 568, 75 N. W. (2d) 212; State v. Besse, 160 Minn. 533, 200 N. W. 356.

Reference

Full Case Name
State Ex Rel. Robert Lee Cole v. Ralph H. Tahash
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published