Minnesota Supreme Court, 1967

Peterson v. Peterson

Peterson v. Peterson
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 27, 1967 · Pep
278 Minn. 432; 153 N.W.2d 830; 1967 Minn. LEXIS 889 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Jerome Daly, pro se, for relator., James P. Rorris and Dygert & Gunn, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1971, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Peterson v. Peterson

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Pep Curiam.

Relptor was convicted of contempt by the District Court of Hennepin Coupty OP March 19, 1965. The contempt was both constructive and criminal in nature. Because relator was not afforded a jury trial and the proceedings do not conform to the procedures required by our decision in Peterson *433v. Peterson, 278 Minn. 275, 153 N. W. (2d) 825, his convictioh Must be reversed and a new trial granted.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.