Minnesota Supreme Court, 1967

Peterson v. Peterson

Peterson v. Peterson
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 27, 1967
278 Minn. 433; 153 N.W.2d 831; 1967 Minn. LEXIS 890 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Nilvá, Shaw & Frisch and Ray Flader, for relator., James P. Rorris and Dygert & Gunn, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1971, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Peterson v. Peterson

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Relator was convicted of constructive criminal contempt by the District Court of Hennepin County on March 18, 1965. The proceedings were prosecuted: by plaintiff-respondent’s private attorney rather thari by the county attorney, and relator was not afforded a jury trial. The judgment accordingly must be reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with Peterson v. Peterson, 278 Minn. 275, 153 N. W. (2d) 825.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.