Sussman v. Sussman

Minnesota Supreme Court
Sussman v. Sussman, 178 N.W.2d 244 (Minn. 1970)
287 Minn. 553; 1970 Minn. LEXIS 1172
Knutson, Rogosheske, Sheran, Peterson, Murphy

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Sussman v. Sussman

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a complaint without prejudice. The order is not appealable. Fischer v. Perisian, 251 Minn. 166, 86 N. W. (2d) 737. We have examined the record and find no basis for according discretionary review. A judgment of the district court was entered December 9, 1963, resolving the claims underlying the dismissed complaint. This judgment is not subject to collateral attack. Campbell v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc. 273 Minn. 525, 142 *554 N. W. (2d) 255. While such a judgment can be attacked directly, 1 plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that her right to this relief, if any, has been prejudiced by the order of dismissal.

Appeal dismissed.

1

Minn. St. 548.14. See, also, In re Trusteeship under Will of Melgaard, 200 Minn. 493, 274 N. W. 641.

Reference

Full Case Name
Pearl L. Sussman v. Ross A. Sussman
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published