Strei v. Church of St. Joseph
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1976, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hill v. Conroy Bros. Co., Inc. (Minn. 1975)
- Meyer v. Signs (Minn. 1975)
- Hed v. Brockway Glass Co. (Minn. 1976)
- Webster v. Lull Engineering (Minn. 1976)
- Bertsch v. Varnum Lumber & Fuel Co. (Minn. 1975)
- Brening v. Roto-Press, Inc. (Minn. 1975)
- Barcel v. Barrel Finish (Minn. 1975)
- Yerhart v. GEO. A. HORMEL & COMPANY (Minn. 1975)
- Anderson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. (Minn. 1975)
- Orres v. Employers Overload Co. (Minn. 1975)
- Sommers v. Diversified Activities (Minn. 1975)
- Creathers v. Armour & Co. (Minn. 1975)
- Thurston v. Northern Cooperatives, Inc. (Minn. 1975)
- Tuomela v. Reserve Mining Company (Minn. 1974)
- Greene v. W & W GENERATOR REBUILDERS (Minn. 1974)
- Hammes v. Suk (Minn. 1971)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Certiorari to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding medical expenses to an employee. The commission found from the testimony of the only medical expert that the employee sustained a personal injury arising out of and in the course of his em *566 ployment. Relators contend that employee’s injury did not arise out of his employment.
Because we cannot hold that the determinative finding that employee's injury arose out of his employment is unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted, 1 we affirm.
Affirmed.
See Minn. St. 15.0425(e), which is synonymous with this court’s previous enunciations of the scope of review of decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission, collected in 21 Dunnell, Dig. (3 ed.) § 10426.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.