Minnesota Supreme Court, 1972

Otis v. First National Bank of Minneapolis

Otis v. First National Bank of Minneapolis
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided March 3, 1972 · Knutson, Otis, Peterson, Todd, Mason
195 N.W.2d 432; 292 Minn. 497; 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1361 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Jerome E. Kline, for appellant., Richards, Montgomery, Cobb & Bassford and Lynn G. Truesdell III, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2000, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Otis v. First National Bank of Minneapolis

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff slipped and fell on a small puddle of water, 3 to 5 inches in circumference, on defendant bank’s floor near a teller’s window. Except for this puddle and some adjacent small puddles, as well as some “damp footmarks,” plaintiff could “walk just normal” on the “fine, dry floor.” It had been raining hard, and the bank had been open only 20 minutes at the time plaintiff entered. The circumstances strongly suggest that *498 the water was shed from the clothing or umbrellas of one or more persons who preceded plaintiff into the bank.

No evidence was introduced by plaintiff to show that defendant had actual or constructive notice of those puddles. The circumstances of time and condition were not such as to impose upon defendant a duty to have discovered and removed the puddle. The trial court accordingly directed a verdict for defendant, a ruling fully supported by Anderson v. St. Thomas More Newman Center, 287 Minn. 251, 178 N. W. 2d 242 (1970), and Filipczak v. International Brotherhood of Elec. Workers, 292 Minn. 486, 195 N. W. 2d 433 (1972). 1

Affirmed.

1

See, also, Parker v. McCrory Stores Corp. 76 Pa. 122, 101 A. 2d 377 (1954); Parks v. Montgomery Ward & Co. 198 F. 2d 772 (10 Cir. 1952); Deptula v. New Britain Trust Co. 19 Conn. Sup. 434, 116 A. 2d 773 (1955); Tariff v. S. S. Kresge Co. 299 Mass. 129, 12 N. E. 2d 79 (1937).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.