Sinn v. City of St. Cloud
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2014, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward (Minn. 2014)
- Schatz v. Interfaith Care Center (Minn. 2012)
- Matter of Schmidt (Minn. 1989)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment ordered by the district court determining that he was 100 percent negligent in the accident which was the subject matter of the litigation. The jury had returned a verdict finding him 90 percent negligent. Plaintiff requests that we reinstate the jury verdict.
Such action by this court would not be of any benefit to the plaintiff in the instant case since he would still be denied any recovery under our comparative negligence law. Whether such action would have any precedential value for plaintiff vis-a-vis defendant in other litigation involving passengers in plaintiff’s airplane is not a part of the present proceedings before this court. This court does not issue advisory opinions or decide cases merely to make precedents. St. Paul City Ry. Co. v. City of St. Paul, 259 Minn. 129, 106 N. W. 2d 452 (1960).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.