State v. Hardin

Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Hardin, 202 N.W.2d 212 (Minn. 1972)
294 Minn. 556; 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1467
Knutson, Otis, Peterson, Kelly

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 3 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State v. Hardin

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This matter comes to us on appeal from an order of the Hennepin County Municipal Court. The defendant challenged the jurisdiction of *557 that* court and moved to dismiss the complaint against her which charged’ her with carrying a firearm in violation of a city ordinánce. The lower court denied the motion and we dismiss the appeal from that order. \

Under Minn. St. 632.01, an appeal in a criminal case may only be taken from a judgment or order denying a new trial. For purposes of appeal, ordinance violations are considered criminal proceedings. Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261, 199 N. W. 918 (1924). Thus, the appeal in this case is from a nonappealable order and we therefore dismiss the same.

Appeal ■ dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
State v. Cara Nina Hardin
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published