Murphy v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court
Murphy v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 194 N.W.2d 189 (Minn. 1972)
292 Minn. 450; 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1334
Knutson, Otis, Rogosheske, Peterson, Murphy, Todd

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 4 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Murphy v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relator seeks review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission reversing an order which had granted her dependency compensation.

Three physicians testified that the heart attack which caused the employee’s death was work-related. Three equally qualified physicians testified to the contrary.

Since the commission had before it credible testimony on which to base its findings, and the findings are not manifestly contrary to the evidence, we are bound by them. Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc. 282 Minn. 322, 164 N. W. 2d 873 (1969); Grabowski v. Great Northern Oil Co. 283 Minn. 205, 167 N. W. 2d 14 (1969); Murphy v. St. Paul Goodwill Industries, 283 Minn. 496, 168 N. W. 2d 505 (1969).

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Mr. Justice Todd, not having been a member of this court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Reference

Full Case Name
Marie Murphy v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and Another
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published